Automate the clear cases
Routine work proceeds under the policies you define.
AI errors are costly. So is checking every output. Themis shows which predictions need attention.
AI errors are costly, and so is checking every output. The question is not whether to automate — it is which decisions to trust.
Themis finds the right point — for each decision, not once for the whole system.
Automate everything and errors reach operations. Review everything and the cost moves to your experts. Total cost is lowest in between — and the right point differs from one decision to the next.
Fig. 1 — Total cost = errors acted on + review effort. Scroll to move the operating point.
Themis connects each output with evidence and operating context, and gives it a next step before it is acted on. Pick a case to see where it goes.
The output matches the evidence, and the input resembles familiar cases.
→ ProceedThe action continues.
The output contradicts a relevant record.
→ VerifyMore evidence is gathered before acting.
The input is unfamiliar — but another model or tool is a better fit.
→ RerouteThe case moves to that model or tool.
Evidence is still inconclusive, and an error here would be costly.
→ EscalateA human expert reviews it.
Routine work proceeds under the policies you define.
Experts and checks go to the decisions that need them.
Decide when another document, simulation or experiment is worth its cost.
Bring one repeated decision. We'll show you where Themis fits.
Use predictions to move engineering work forward, and focus high-fidelity simulation, experiments and expert review where they improve the decision.
Explore engineering workflows Agent & operational workflowsImprove extraction, matching and reconciliation — and apply the same check to an agent's next action.
Explore operational workflowsBenchmark · Research evaluation on HWU64, zero-shot on 16 held-out intents, using d1-3B. Both approaches use the same underlying model; only the choice of which requests to automate changes.
Read the studyThe model you already run makes a prediction, ŷ — or an agent proposes its next action. On its own, nothing says whether to trust it.
Capsa adds a proprietary risk signal alongside each prediction. Every prediction now carries σ — and this one is less certain than it looks.
Themis connects outputs with evidence and operating context. Here, the prediction contradicts a relevant record.
You decide what can proceed automatically, and what is too costly to get wrong without a check.
The decision layer combines every signal. This prediction is verified before anyone acts — the clear ones proceed on their own.
Capsa adds a proprietary risk signal to the models you already run, so every prediction ŷ comes paired with σ, Capsa’s uncertainty estimate — the signal that tells the decision layer when to check before acting.
See how Capsa worksTell us where errors, delays or unnecessary review slow your workflow. We'll explore where Themis helps.